<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Mobility Humanities</title>
		<link>https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com</link>
		<description>Mobility, Humanities, mobilityhumanities, AMH, konkuk, 모빌리티인문학,인문학</description>
		
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1(Cover, Copyright, and Contents)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=168]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone wp-image-2858" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135437.png" alt="" width="356" height="505" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-2859" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135459.png" alt="" width="354" height="503" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-2860" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135510.png" alt="" width="355" height="506" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspirations of Flight]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=167]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Humankind has long aspired to belong to the heavens, after having roamed the land and the seas as part of their usual existence. Indeed, the possibility of ruling the sky has always captured the imagination of cultures throughout history. In this issue, we aim to examine the varied "aspirations of flight" that populate our world today. At the same time, we hope to inhere a more contested sense of the term, by contemplating three cognate concepts that can help to nuance how aspirations take flight. These are namely grandeur, competition and nostalgia. As an endeavour to challenge gravity and the impossible, flight is a special act already predisposed to promoting itself and sketching positive visions for the future, but it also carries with it its own particular baggage and politics.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Breathing towards Aeromobility: Aspiration, Flying and Elsewhere(s)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=166]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this essay, I aim to trace connections between aspiration and mobility to argue how aspirations are mobilised through their connection to elsewhere(s). Taking root from Latin <em>ad spirare</em> (to breathe towards), aspirations not only call for an inward drawing of breath, but also a pause before the inevitable expiration. This paper considers both the metaphor and physical act of breathing in the context of mobilities of flight, amongst others. I invoke the metaphor through ethnographic vignettes of both flying and terrestrial mobilities in African and North American contexts, drawing a parallel between the breath which sustains us and the aspirations that drive us, providing a generative lesson for our affective futures. Through these vignettes, I argue that mobilities driven by the presence of elsewhere(s) are key to understanding how aspiration is mobilised.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspirations of Spaceflight and Trials of Infrastructural Capital]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=165]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Spaceflight calibrates its purview and scope as governments and private companies set out to envelop bodies of planets, moons and asteroids in the techno-industrial processes of production, extraction and destruction. The increasing departures of flights from Earth propel a range of beings and things, ideas and agendas across the Solar System and beyond, heralding the imperial drive of high-tech powers towards bountiful frontiers and magnifying the centrality of infrastructure for aspirations and attempts to grasp them. The enterprise of spaceflight invites us to consider the evolving arena of inquiry into "new geographies of flying" in its space age, bringing into sharp relief the accumulation and investments of "infrastructural capital" that sustain the off-Earth pursuits of power, knowledge and wealth. Attending to the changing aspirations and capacities of spaceflight as it enters a new developmental stage, I outline its key features and itineraries. I explore the striving and struggles involved in movements of infrastructural capital at the space frontier, an evolving off-Earth geography where mobility becomes a vector of power amidst extreme precarity. Such dynamics suggest the central role of spaceflight in upholding aspirations to take the trials of conquest and control outside the globe.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Terminal Politics: Small-state Agency and the Geopolitics of Aviation Infrastructure in Nepal]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=164]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article examines how civil aviation infrastructure operates as both a catalyst for development and a geopolitical instrument, using Nepal's Pokhara International Airport (PIA) as a case study. Rather than generalising from Nepal to a universal model of small-state behaviour, the article uses Nepal as a strategically situated case to analyse how regional asymmetries shape small-state agency. Drawing on fieldwork, interviews, and document analysis, it shows how Nepal used PIA to project sovereignty and diversify diplomatic ties while revealing persistent dependencies. From a Nepali perspective, three dynamics emerge: airports function as sites of geopolitical negotiation rather than merely technical facilities; small states enact agency through symbolic diaplomacy and selective engagement; and infrastructural ambitions remain embedded in asymmetric regional power relations. By foregrounding aviation, an often-overlooked sector in South Asian infrastructure debates, the article develops an analytical framework that bridges Science and Technology Studies, small-state theory, and geopolitics to show how infrastructure projects embody both material and symbolic power.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspiration and the Aerotropolis: Airports, Infrastructural Speculation and Geoeconomic Form]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=163]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article examines the aerotropolis as a globally circulating geoeconomic model that links aviation infrastructure to supply chains and speculative aspirations of growth. It shows that while aerotropolis imaginaries build upon early ideas of ascendencce associated with flight and fantastical visions of aerial futures, aerotropolis realities often also rehash tired supply chains of logistics, freight and defence that rely on global ecological extractions. While the aerotropolis form is highly contextual, it is at once generic and repetitive. Focusing on three case studies-Dallas Fort Worth, Zhengzhou and Incheon-the article critically analyses how the aerotropolis has been taken up and reworked across distinct geopolitical and institutional contexts. It considers the specific aspirations that have shaped each project, including efforts to establish new urban centres, reconfigure economic regions, and position cites within global logistical networks. In doing so, the article explores the evolving aeropolitics of airport development and considers how the aerotropolis is transformative as both a spatial concept and a vehicle for imagining new geoeconomic forms.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[From Frictionless Futures to Tedious Tasks: Datafication Discourses of the Smart Airport]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=162]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This paper examines the sociotechnical imaginaries underpinning the "smart airport," showing how visions of seamless, data-driven dfficiency obscure the laborious human practices that sustain them. Through a discourse analysis of aviation industry marketing materials, contrasted with observations at "SmartAirport," the study reveals how datafication-the conversion of social, material, and environmental processes into machine-readable data-reconfigures labour, power, and mobility within technocapitalist frameworks. While industry narratives frame data as a panacea for operational challenges-depicting it as an omniscient, predictive force promising autonomous, frictionless perations via centralised dashboards and digital twins-this paper exposes the tedium and contingency of datafication in practice. These systems rely on constant human intervention, including calibrating sensors, correcting algorithmic errors, filling data gaps, and maintaining complex infrastructures. By contrasting the aspirational discourse with on-the-ground realities, the paper highlights the paradoxes of datafication: While it promises supra-human efficiency, it intensifies and redistributes labour rather than eliminating it. The study contributes to critical geographies of automation and datafication by emphasising the indispensable role of human work in supposedly autonomous systems and challenging deterministic narratives of technological progress.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Yogyakarta International Airport Aerotropolis as a Political Project]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=161]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article examines the Yogyakarta International Airport (YIA) aerotropolis as a political project of infrastructure mobility in contemporary Indonesia. Rather than just being a state project for the public interest, the YIA aerotropolis demonstrates how infrastructure is utilised to manifest political aspirations for modernity. Drawing on ethnographic research in Yogyakarta and Jakarta, I explore how bureaucratic infrastructures, planning and national development narratives converge to construct the aerotropolis as a symbol of national progress. However, these aspirations of a modern moment highlight contradictions between the state's rhetoric on infrastructural development and mobility and the socio-spatial realities of displacement and exclusion encountered by local communities. Through a critical analysis of planning documents and interviews with policymakers, planners, and regional stakeholders, the article contextualises the YIA aerotropolis within wider discussions about the promises of infrastructure and the politics of aeromobility in the Global South. The YIA aerotropolis embodies a performative vision of infrastructures where future-oriented rhetoric about connectivity legitimises expropriation and uneven development. This study contributes to our understanding of how infrastructures shape the conceptions of mobility, citizenship, and belonging that emerge under contemporary state-led infrastructure modernisation.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Space of Farewells: Imaginaries, Uneven Mobilities and the Making of an Airport in the Global South]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=160]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[The field of aeromobilities has evolved into a multifaceted domain of research, shaped by diverse scales, contexts, and disciplinary approaches, most of which originate in the Global North. Seeking to contribute to a Southern perspective on airports' material aesthetics and airport geography, this study examines the building process and subsequent structure and interior design development of the new Mariscal Sucre International Airport (MSA) in Quito, Ecuador, between 2013 and 2024. The study first explores the historical, emotional, and social practices attached to the former airport. Second, it describes the aspirations and narratives articulated by state authorities and technical actors regarding the new airport. It finalises with an analysis of the current infrastructure and interior design. This analysis highlights a disjuncture between official imaginaries, the built environment and local dynamics. During the first phase (2013-2018), interior design largely followed global commercial and aesthetic norms, privileging international standards over local identity. In the second phase (2019-2024), however, the airport has undergone transformations, incorporating local elements to the space. Yet, despite its celebrated design, the MSA contrasts sharply with the uneven development and social exclusion of its surrounding territory.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Air We Fly: Dwelling in Aeromobile Atmospheres]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=159]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article addresses two central questions: how are atmospheres configured in the context of aeromobilities, and how can this context enrich the very concept of atmospheres? To pursue them, I draw on ethnographic research at Santiago International Airport, participation in aerospace fairs in Santiago, London and Lisbon, and the use of travel diaries and interviews with passengers and professionals. I develop the notion of aeromobile atmospheres to describe the politico-material interfaces in which infrastructures, bodies, regulations and imaginaries are entangled. Rather than understanding atmospheres as fleeting affective tonalities, the article shows how they emerge from material and sensory constellations and how they are staged, contested and reconfigured across scales. Three ethnographic cases orient the analysis: an incomplete journey that exposes the contingency of flight, the "ghost flights" of the pandemic that sustained systemic continuity, and aerospace fairs that project atmospheres of certainty. In bringing these cases into dialogue, the article argues that aeromobile atmospheres are simultaneously conditions of possibility and sites of friction, making visible inequalities of access, environmental contradictions and political disputes.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Infrastructuring Migration Studies in the Asian Context]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=158]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This introduction, following "An Interview with Brenda S.A. Yeoh," outlines her migration research trajectory over more than thirty years by focusing on three interrelated topics: Singapore as a mobile city, mobility and infrastructures, and the Asian context. First, Yeoh approaches Singapore as a mobile city in which multiple mobilities intersect, while criticising the ideology of the global city as an enclosed city-state often imagined or aspired to by Singaporean politicians seeking to consolidate the strength of a newly independent polity. Second, in dialogue with the new mobilities paradigm that foregrounds the politics of mobility, Yeoh understands migration as a form of mobility, paying particular attention to infrastructures that facilitate and/or disrupt mobilities yet are largely taken for granted. Lastly, Yeoh examines Asian migration as distinct from European and North American experiences by emphasising "the Asian context," while simultaneously challenging the prevailing conditions of knowledge production. In this sense, her research trajectory can be seen as actively infrastructuring migration studies in the Asian context, particularly through her practice of the methodology of "inter-referencing," which extends beyond infra-Asian comparison to encompass relations between Asia and non-Asia.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[An Interview with Brenda S.A. Yeoh]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=157]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<strong>Brenda S.A. Yeoh</strong> is Distinguished Professor of Social Sciences, Department of Geography, National University of Singapore (NUS). Having made important contributions to the field of migration and transnationalism studies, she was awarded the Vautrin Lud Prize for outstanding achievements in Geography in 2021. Her research interests include the politics of space in colonial and postcolonial cities and she also has considerable experience working on a wide range of migration research in Asia, including key themes such as cosmopolitanism and highly skilled talent migration; gender, social reproduction and care migration; migration, national identity and citizenship issues; globalising universities and international student mobilities; and cultural politics, family dynamics and international marriage migrants. She has published widely in these fields.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Review of Urban Mobilities in Literature and Art Activism]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=156]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<em>Urban Mobilities in Literature and Art Activism</em>, edited by Patricia García and Anna-Leena Toivanen in 2024 as part of Palgrave Macmillan's Literary Urban Studies series, is a volume composed of 14 chapters(including a well-informed and informative "Introduction") authored by 14 different scholars. The book intends to contribute to the humanities turn in mobility studies by examining representations of "(im)mobilities in urban spaces ... in literary narratives as well as in other arts" (1). The result is a very well-structured, cohesive, and eclectic volume that not only benefits the increasing, but still underexplored, dialogue between literary and art studies, on the one hand, and mobility studies, on the other, but may also draw further attention to the relevance of literature and other arts in understanding movement.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[《Mobility Humanities (5.1)》 Is Out Now!]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=169]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are pleased to announce that Mobility Humanities (5.1) is now available at our website: <a href="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com">http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com</a>. This issue features nine articles, an interview with Brenda S.A. Yeoh, as well as a book review. It also includes a Special Issue section on “Aspirations of Flight,” guest-edited by Weiqiang Lin and Benjamin Linder.

The cover and table of contents are included below for your information.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2858 aligncenter" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135437.png" alt="" width="624" height="886" /><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2860 aligncenter" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135510.png" alt="" width="624" height="890" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=2"><![CDATA[Notice]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CFP for《Mobility Humanities (6.2)》 Special Issue: “Infrastructuring Mobilities: Backbones and Entanglements of Leisure, Tourism and Migration”]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=154]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Special Issue (for publication July 2027)


CALL FOR PAPERS

“INFRASTRUCTURING MOBILITIES:
BACKBONES AND ENTANGLEMENTS OF LEISURE, TOURISM AND MIGRATION”


Guest Editors:
Thiago Allis, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Franz Buhr, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Jessica Frazão, University of São Paulo, Brazil


In the broad context of contemporary mobilities, recent developments in mobility infrastructures are reshaping how people travel and experience tourism-oriented routines. From face recognition at passport control to AI-assisted holiday planning, these infrastructures—whether material or digital—underpin diverse forms of (im)mobility. Thinking through infrastructures allows us to understand not only how people, information, waste, drugs, suitcases, and images circulate, but also how they ‘land’ in specific destinations, transforming spaces and local social dynamics. Not only airports or coffee shops, but entire urban neighbourhoods and ‘neo-rural’ attractions have emerged or changed in order to accommodate, facilitate, or restrict different kinds of mobility (for instance, digital nomads and asylum seekers, or the so-called ‘mass’ tourists and visitors seeking “off-the-beaten-track” experiences). To the familiar repertoire of mobility infrastructures—hotels, airports, tourist information centres, and souvenir shops—one can now add new amenities such as coliving spaces, coworking hubs, and app-generated personalised tours.

In this special issue, we approach infrastructures as “systematically interlinked technologies, institutions and actors that facilitate and condition mobility” (Xiang &amp; Lindquist 2014, 122). This definition expands the notion of infrastructure to include both human and non-human agents implicated in shaping mobility. At the same time, we

recognise that infrastructures can themselves be mobile, ephemeral, and bottom-up (Meeus, Arnaut &amp; van Heur 2019), as well as enduring and capable of sustaining mobility not only as dislocation but also as a defining feature of contemporary lifestyles (Jung &amp; Buhr 2023).

Mobility has always depended on apparatuses that channel flows, set directions, and regulate their pace—accelerating some movements while slowing down or blocking others. Kevin Hannam, Mimi Sheller and John Urry (Urry, 2003; Hannam et al., 2006) originally conceptualised – followed by others (Freire-Medeiros &amp; Vianna Pinho, 2024) – the discussion of the mobility–moorings dialectic, shedding light on the relatively stable systems that enable, shape, or constrain movement. The strength of analytically examining infrastructures, rather than simply assuming phenomena as ‘more’ or ‘less’ mobile, enables a contextualised analysis of mobility and its embeddedness in multi-scalar regimes of power (Glick Schiller &amp; Salazar 2012), generating uneven and often deeply unequal patterns of movement—such as migration policies’ implicit distinction between ‘wanted’ and ‘unwanted’ tourists or migrants.

Infrastructures are the architecture for circulation (Larkin 2013) and, as such, they may be more or less visible, mundane, taken for granted, as well as spectacular, highly politicised, and in constant dispute. Like other forms of architecture, mobility infrastructures are built or composed by people, requiring little or huge amounts of money, aiming to tackle perceived issues, and targeting specific social groups and their needs. They may be lucrative, public, (un)official, answer to the demands of social civil movements, as well as mirror existing forms of racism, misogyny, xenophobia, homophobia, classism, etc. Think of walls and barbed wire splitting countries and fast-track corridors for VIP passengers at airports; or of refugee camps and luxury hotels; of soup kitchens for homeless migrants and coworking cafés for digital nomads; women-only tourism packages and sex tourism, for example. Think also about the bodies that are allowed to move freely across the globe and those who are constantly stopped and checked, if not denied transit.

Exploring the infrastructuring role of these emerging materialities in popular leisure destinations helps to unpack how ‘hip’ places transform themselves, adapt to new consumption habits, and tourists’ aesthetic preferences – often to the detriment of longer-term residents’ claims. Or, on the contrary, how certain infrastructures shut down (think of street-level travel agencies), go bankrupt, or move somewhere else. The physicality of infrastructures adds new matter to neighbourhoods (e.g., boutique hotels, amusement parks, gourmet markets, surf schools, minimalist coworking cafés, Instagrammable brunch eateries, etc.). These leisure amenities facilitate short-term travel, networking, group excursions, physical exercise, etc. They accommodate the needs of various kinds of mobile lifestyles, whose movements “resonate with and cut across people and things, spaces and subjects” (Merriman 2016, 85). Infrastructures, nevertheless, are integral to the reproduction of certain kinds of mobility privilege and mobility precarity. Aerial life (Adey, 2010), for instance, is not free of relations of power: it produces and reproduces social differentiation, unevenness, and inequalities (Murray,

Sawchuk, Jirón, 2016), constituting regimes of mobility that affect and shape individual movement across the globe (Glick Shiller, Salazar, 2012).

The way cities increasingly cater to leisure-seeking global middle classes may be more or less exclusive and accentuate existing local fractures. Similarly, examining virtual mobility infrastructures prompts critical questions about the influence of algorithmic knowledge—shaping everything from the very destination choice to the tailor-made visit itineraries proposed by smartphone apps, also including the emergence of fully virtual tourism experiences. Not to mention the paraphernalia that shape work-on-the-move routines of the corporate travel, increasingly mingled with leisure activities, fostering the so-called “bleisure” programs (Lichy &amp; McLeay, 2018).

With this call for papers, we aim to bring together research that places the infrastructural production of leisure mobilities at its centre. We define leisure mobilities broadly, including tourism, leisure-led migration, lifestyle migration, digital nomadism, and other related forms of movement, especially those located closer to the voluntary side of the voluntary-involuntary spectrum driving migration. Anchored in the ‘new mobilities paradigm’ (Sheller &amp; Urry 2006), this special issue will shed light on the practices, actors, policies and technologies that enable or deter multiple and not always obvious tourism-like experiences of mobility.

With this background in mind, this call for papers aims to foster creative interdisciplinary debates on mobility and infrastructures. In doing so, it echoes the efforts of Mobility Humanities to "pluralise" (Adey et al., 2024) infrastructures in the domain of mobility studies, with special attention to auspicious theoretical developments and the dissemination of methodological practices on leisure, tourism, and migration research agendas.


Topics and Themes

We welcome contributions critically addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
● Making visible the often-invisibilised infrastructures and the affordances of mobility, travel, tourism, and migration;
● New tourism experiences enabled by emerging mobility infrastructures (AI, travel apps, thematic apps guiding visitors to niche markets, etc.);
● Social dynamics and experiences produced through new mobility infrastructures (e.g., the use of dating apps, technologies designed to meet other tourists sharing similar interests, or connecting ‘like-minded’ people staying temporarily at a given place, etc.);
● Urban change (such as touristification, gentrification, foodification, gaytrification) as a process of infrastructuring and its impact on local livelihoods and destinations’ ‘vibes’;
● Mobility infrastructures as potential mediation tools between visitors and residents;
● Mobility infrastructures as technologies of control/othering/bordering, possibly reinforcing structural inequalities in travel, access to leisure, and the right to the city;
● Uses of infrastructure as a lens to analyse contemporary cultural products (films, novels, series, etc.) discussing leisure-led mobilities in various contexts;
● Gendered, racialised and/or intersectional (im)mobilities in postcolonial contexts and its entanglements with leisure, tourism and migration;
● Frictions of leisure, diversity and mobile justice and its dependence on infrastructures;
● Agency of things, more-than-human mobilities, and material culture as a reference for the study of leisure-oriented mobilities.

We also encourage submissions that explore other related topics from critical, comparative, or interdisciplinary perspectives.


Submission of Abstracts and Manuscripts

- Deadline for abstract submission (300 words) - January 31st 2026 (email to the guest editors)
- Response to the authors (abstracts) - up to March 1st 2026
- Deadline for full paper submission (7000-8000 words) - July 31th 2026
- Response to authors (paper review period) - up to December 20th 2026
- Publication - July 2027


Author Guidelines

1. Authors must follow specific guidelines for Mobility Humanities and ensure that contributions cover the journal's publication criteria.
2. The Call for Papers is open to a global audience and manuscripts must be written in English.
3. After the guest editors inform the abstracts that they are accepted, Full Papers should be submitted via the submission portal with the notification of the special issue.
4. Once papers are accepted, they will be published online and printed.


Submission Guidelines https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/guidelines/manuscript-submission


Submission Portal https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/mobilityhumanities


Queries

For questions regarding the special issue, please contact guest editors Dr. Thiago Allis (thiagoallis@usp.br), Dr. Franz Buhr (fbuhr@edu.ulisboa.pt) and Dr. Jessica Frazão (jessica.frazao@gmail.com).


The Guest Editors

Dr. Thiago Allis is Associate Professor at the School of Art, Sciences and Humanities, at the University of São Paulo (Brazi), and leader of the Research Group on Tourism and Mobilities (MobTur). His research relies on qualitative mobile methods and focuses on the multiple dimensions of mobilities (corporeal, objects, images, communicative) combined with tourism, including urban tourism, academic mobilities, and aeromobilities.


Dr. Franz Buhr is a researcher at the Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning (IGOT) - University of Lisbon (Portugal), where he writes about the intersections between migration and urban change. He has worked on migrants’ everyday mobilities in Lisbon, on migrant entrepreneurship and transnational gentrification, and is currently working on the relationship between digital nomadism and city transformation in Portugal.


Dr. Jessica Frazão is a member of the Research Group on Tourism and Mobilities (MobTur). She studies Aeromobilites and Air Transport Economics, having conducted qualitative and quantitative research on gender and income inequalities at University of Sao Paulo (Brazil), the Academy of Mobility Humanities at Konkuk University (South Korea) and the Aeronautics Institute of Technology (Brazil). She has worked for several airlines in South America and currently works as a consultant in the Aviation Industry.


References

Adey, P. (2010). Aerial life: Spaces, mobilities, affects. John Wiley &amp; Sons.
Adey, P.; Lee, J.; Peterle,P. &amp; Rossetto, T. (2024). Mobility, Infrastructure and the Humanities. Mobility Humanities, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.23090/MH.2024.01.3.1.001
Freire-Medeiros, B., &amp; Vianna Pinho, I. (2024). Ancoradouros para pesquisas móveis: navegando o sistema de automobilidades a partir do Porto de Santos. Revista Brasileira De Sociologia, 12, e-rbs.1031. https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.1031
Glick Schiller, N., &amp; Salazar, N. B. (2012). Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., &amp; Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189
Hill, A., Hartmann, M., &amp; Andersson, M. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities. Routledge.
Jung, P. &amp; Buhr, F. (2022) Channelling mobilities: migrant-owned businesses as mobility infrastructures, Mobilities, 17(1), 119-135, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1958250
Larkin, B. (2013) The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure, Annual Review of Anthropology 42 (1): 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Lichy, J. &amp; McLeay, F. (2018). Bleisure: Motivations and typologies. Journal of Travel &amp; Tourism Marketing, 35(4), 517-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2017.1364206.
Meeus, B., Arnaut, K. &amp; van Heur, B. (2019) Arrival Infrastructures: Migration and Urban Social Mobilities. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Merriman, P. (2016) Mobility Infrastructures: Modern Visions, Affective Environments and the Problem of Car Parking, Mobilities. 11(1), 83-98, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1097036
Murray, L., Sawchuk, K., &amp; Jirón, P. (2016). Comparative mobilities in an unequal world: researching intersections of gender and generation. Mobilities, 11(4), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211822
Salazar, N. B., &amp; Schiller, N. G. (2014). Regimes of Mobility. London: Routledge.
Sheller, M., &amp; Urry, J. (2006). The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Urry, J. (2003). Global Complexity. Cambridge, Polity Press
Xiang, B. &amp; Lindquist, J. (2014) Migration Infrastructure, International Migration Review 48 (S1): S122–S48, https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12141]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=2"><![CDATA[Notice]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CFP for《Mobility Humanities (7.1)》 Special Issue: “Imagining the Railway, 1900 to the Present"]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=153]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Special Issue (for publication January 2028)

CALL FOR PAPERS

“Imagining the Railway, 1900 to the Present”

Guest Editors:

Adam Borch, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Jason Finch, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Frederik Van Dam, Radboud University, Netherlands

We invite scholars to submit article proposals for a special issue in the open-access journal Mobility Humanities on the cultural impact of the railway since 1900. Scholars from any disciplinary background are welcome, although the special issue is likely to be of particular interest to those working in areas like mobility humanities, literary, film or visual studies, cultural geography and transport history.

In the nineteenth century, the expansion and use of trains changed people’s perception of the world. Following Wolfgang Schivelbusch’s pioneering work, scholars have documented the myriad ways in which the nineteenth-century railway changed the experience of travelling and influenced the form and creation of different cultural media. The history of the railway in the more recent past, in which the train’s dominance as a form of transport was challenged by the automobile and the aeroplane, has received comparatively little attention. This special issue aims to highlight the fact that the railway remained a significant influence on artistic development and cultural practices: as novels by Graham Greene and Toni Morrison attest, for instance, trains have been invested with new imaginative possibilities during the twentieth century and since, and these are deserving of sustained critical attention.

This special issue will therefore explore the literary and cultural significance of the railway from 1900 to the present. In doing so, it seeks to take stock of new insights from the fields of mobility studies and infrastructure studies. We welcome proposals that focus on the relationship between the railway and literature, cinema, the visual arts, music, games, and/or other cultural modes.

Themes to be explored include, but are not limited to, the following:

· the railway and (literary and/or artistic) form
· gender and sexual identity
· (post)colonial perspectives
· railway and war
· experiences of long-distance travel
· experiences of commuting
· spaces of the railway
· the railway’s impact on landscape and environment
· comparisons between literary and visual depictions of the railway

If you are interested, please send a proposal of max. 500 words to the editors no later than 30 September 2025. All abstracts should include a title as well as the names, affiliations and email addresses of all authors. Please also provide a short bio (max. 100 words) for each author.


Important Dates


· 30 September 2025: deadline for submission of article proposals.
· 31 October 2025: authors notified about acceptance/rejection of their proposal
· 30 June 2026: deadline for submission of full articles (c.8,000 words) for peer review
· 1 January 2028: publication of Special Issue in Mobility Humanities

NB. Mobility Humanities offers the possibility of publishing articles online-first during 2027.


Submission Guidelines: https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/guidelines/manuscript-submission
Submission Portal: Abstract and final paper must be emailed to Adam Borch, Jason Finch, and Frederik Van Dam prior to the submission at the Mobility Humanities portal (https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/mobilityhumanities)


Contact Details
If you have any questions about the special issue, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

· Adam Borch, Åbo Akademi University, Finland (aborch@abo.fi)
· Jason Finch, Åbo Akademi University, Finland (jason.finch@abo.fi) · Frederik Van Dam, Radboud University, Netherlands (frederik.vandam@ru.nl)

The Journal

Mobility Humanities is an open-access journal with a strong editorial board. It is a peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary journal published two times per year by the Academy of Mobility Humanities at Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea. While seeking vibrant interdisciplinary discussions on the phenomena, technologies, and infrastructures of mobility and its ramifications from the humanities perspective, Mobility Humanities encourages papers that delve into their cultural-political, ethical, and spiritual and emotional meanings, focusing on the representation, imagination, and speculation that surround mobility.

For more: journal-mobilityhumanities.com


The Guest Editors

Adam Borch is a doctoral candidate at the department of English Language and Literature, Åbo Akademi University, Finland. In his thesis, he examines the role of anonymity in the work of Alexander Pope with a particular focus on the satirical poem the Dunciad. He has published articles on provincial urban identity in eighteenth-century England (2017, 2021), didactic poetry in the eighteenth century (2019) and learned societies’ use of new media (2022). He recently co-edited a special issue in the Journal of Transport History on the topic of “Tram Closures Narrated, Experienced and Contested” (2024). Between 2020-2022, he worked as a research assistant in the HERA-funded project “Public Transport as Public Space in European Cities: Narrating, Contesting, Experiencing” (PUTSPACE).


Jason Finch is Professor in the department of English Language and Literature at Åbo Akademi University in Finland. A spatial and urban literary scholar trained in British modernism who takes a comparative view of cities, his most recent book is Literary Urban Studies and How to Practice It (Routledge, 2022). He is also a co-editor of 2023 special features in Urban Studies and the Journal of Urban History. Earlier books include Deep Locational Criticism (Benjamins, 2016) and, as co-editor, Literary Second Cities (Palgrave, 2017). From 2024 to 2027 he is Principal Investigator of the funded project ‘Twentieth Century Railway Imaginations: Building the Mobility and Infrastructural Humanities’ (RAILIMAGE).


Frederik Van Dam is Assistant Professor of European Literature at Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. He is the author of Anthony Trollope’s Late Style: Victorian Liberalism and Literary Form (2016) and the co-editor of The Edinburgh Companion to Anthony Trollope (2019). He is currently finishing a project that deals with British poetry and international cooperation, and his most recent work focuses on Central-European modernism and infrastructure. He chairs the European Consortium for Humanities Institutes and Centres and he is one of the editors of the European Journal of English Studies. In 2015, he created a documentary about the literary critic J. Hillis Miller, The Pleasure of that Obstinacy.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=2"><![CDATA[Notice]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[《Mobility Humanities (4.2)》 Is Out Now!]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=152]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are pleased to announce that <strong><em><span class="s7">Mobility Humanities</span></em></strong><span class="s6"> (4.2) </span><span class="s6">is now available at our website: </span><a href="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/"><span class="s10">http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com</span></a>. This issue features nine articles, an interview with Joel Wainwright, as well as a book review. It also includes a Special Issue section on “'Detour' Mobilities,” guest-edited by Jean-Baptiste Frétigny and Weiqiang Lin.

The cover and table of contents are included below for your information.

<img class="alignnone wp-image-2806 aligncenter" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cover-Copyright-Contents-MH-4-2_page-0001-8-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="529" height="754" />

<img class="alignnone wp-image-2805 aligncenter" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cover-Copyright-Contents-MH-4-2_page-0003-5-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="531" height="756" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=2"><![CDATA[Notice]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2(Cover, Copyright, and Contents)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=151]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone wp-image-2806" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cover-Copyright-Contents-MH-4-2_page-0001-8-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="513" /><img class="alignnone wp-image-2804" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cover-Copyright-Contents-MH-4-2_page-0002-6-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="513" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-2805" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cover-Copyright-Contents-MH-4-2_page-0003-5-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="356" height="508" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Theorising "Detour" Mobilities]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=150]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[While detours permeate people’s daily lives, scholars have rarely focused their attention on the potential of detours to inform new meanings and space-time relationships in mobilities. This special issue probes the logics, sensibilities and experiences that detouring entails as a social and cultural endeavour. In this introduction, we acknowledge the concept’s frequent association with inconvenience and frustration, and touch on its more fruitful or subversive compositions, epitomised by the notion of dérive and other humanities concerns. We then chart a range of emergent and promising uses of detours in the fields of migration, pedestrianism, the arts and literary studies. Finally, we highlight three theoretical impetuses at stake in following these elongated paths. The collection of papers forming this special issue questions the generativeness of such circuitous motion, beyond its productivist framing. They focus on the intentionality, tactics, and aesthetics of the people performing them, while paying attention to the entanglements of (non)human agencies engaged in these topologies of space-time.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 13:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA["All We Could Do Was Wait": Unravelling Detour Mobilities at the Serbian-Hungarian Border]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=149]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 2015 so-called “European refugee crisis” saw an unprecedented number of refugees enter Europe via the Balkan Route. Despite the corridor officially closing in March 2016, refugees continued to travel along the Route to reach Western Europe via (in)formal border crossings. This paper examines “The List,” a document that existed between the Serbian and Hungarian authorities to manage mobility across their shared border. It remained the single legal pathway to the European Union available to refugees based in Serbia from mid 2016 until March 2020. This article seeks to conceptualise the role of detours as a mechanism of governing (im)mobility along informal migration corridors. Detours, as mechanisms of control over mobility, offer a critical lens for understanding the interplay between power, temporality, and the lived experiences of forced migration. By exploring detours in this way, their dual role in fostering hope and agency while simultaneously enforcing control and exclusion can be examined.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="http://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>