<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Mobility Humanities</title>
		<link>https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com</link>
		<description>Mobility, Humanities, mobilityhumanities, AMH, konkuk, 모빌리티인문학,인문학</description>
		
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2(Cover, Copyright, and Contents)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=188]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone wp-image-3277" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-07-24-%EC%98%A4%ED%9B%84-8.54.43.png" alt="" width="355" height="507" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-3278" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-07-24-%EC%98%A4%ED%9B%84-8.54.56.png" alt="" width="355" height="507" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-3279" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-07-24-%EC%98%A4%ED%9B%84-8.55.14.png" alt="" width="355" height="505" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobilities, Mobilisations, and the Humanities]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=187]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Towards a Social-Ecological Mobility System: The Role of Grassroots Initiatives in Building Urban Transformative Capacity in Vienna]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=186]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Urban Transformative Capacity (UTC) highlights the conditions that enable urban practitioners to initiate transformations towards desired futures. While the role of grassroots initiatives (GIs) in co-creating sustainable transitions is increasingly recognised, empirical evidence on how they interact with diverse actors and contribute to UTC remains limited. This paper examines the case of Platz für Wien ("Space for Vienna"), a city-wide GI in Vienna demanding street reallocation and sustainable mobility policies. Drawing on six expert interviews with actors from politics, administration, intermediaries, and the initiative itself, we analyse how the GI contributes to four UTC components: Inclusive &amp; Multiform Urban Governance (C1), Transformative Leadership (C2), Empowered Communities of Practice (C3), and Sustainability Foresight (C5). The findings indicate that PfW strengthened C1 and C2 by raising the importance of mobility issues and signalling coalitions, while contributions to C3 were informal and time-bounded, and the coupling to C5 remained weak. Enabling mechanisms included media visibility and supportive district-level actors, whereas constraints involved fragmented competences, non-transparent procedures, resource asymmetries, and perceptions of partisan proximity. While limited to a single case, the study suggests broader implications for understanding the role of GIs in urban mobility transitions and highlights avenues for future research.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Freedom and Unfreedom of Mobility: Transport Justice and Its Discontents in Metro Atlanta’s Transit Struggles]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=185]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Taking its point of departure in recent critiques of transport justice scholarship, this paper draws on a study of transit struggles in metropolitan Atlanta to contribute to the understanding of the limits and prospects of addressing transport-related challenges by increasing urban residents' capacity for mobility. In 2010, the leadership of Clayton County terminated the county's small-scale transit system, leaving thousands of predominantly Black riders without access to viable transport options. In 2014, following extensive efforts by transit activists, the transit infrastructure was restored when the county joined the city's main public transport agency, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA). While joining MARTA significantly advanced transport and racial justice, the need for mobility was to a considerable extent grounded in how racialised housing and labour markets require many to take on long and burdensome commutes. The paper forwards the claim that the conditions in Clayton foreground the need for a dialectical apprehension of how mobility engenders both freedom and unfreedom, and highlights the importance of avoiding simplified conclusions about how a higher capacity for mobility is somehow a panacea. In doing so, the paper corroborates and contributes to the hitherto largely theoretical discussions of these issues by critical transport scholars.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Making the Bike Mobile in Latin America: Cycling Activism and Urban Knowledge Circulation]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=184]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Early on, scholars pioneering the field of policy mobilities noted that activists can be key players in mobilising urban knowledge and best practices. Yet, with few exceptions, activists have played a marginal role in this scholarship. This is a missed opportunity to engage with the complex and fluid ecology of actors that variously work to assemble the city. Regarding cycling policy, there exists a blurry boundary between experts and non-experts that demands a closer engagement with activists and richer accounts of the spatialities and strategies that make the bike mobile in different ways. This paper puts policy mobilities into dialogue with social movement and Science and Technology studies to better account for activists' role in urban knowledge circuits; move beyond policy mobilities' persistent focus on elite actors; and more clearly elucidate how cities are assembled and contested. It does so by attending to cycling activism in Latin America and the World Bike Forum, a grassroots event created and sustained by Latin American cycling activists.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[People in Trains: Civic Activism and the Politics of Care for Human Accident Victims in Mumbai’s Commuter Railways]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=183]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This paper examines the dynamics that shape the limits of political action in India's railway system, elucidating how this vast, complex, and opaque institution impedes the participation of specific groups and the politicisation of certain issues. The paper contextualises this through an empirical investigation of human accidents in Mumbai's commuter railways, where systemic processes such as the techno-legal classification of human accidents as minor incidents; the criminalisation of footboard travel and track crossing; and fragmented state accountability, have historically intersected to deny visibility, care, and political rights to victims. The paper then delineates the process through which this violence was politicised in the 1990s through the embodied efforts of commuters and various accident-affected persons. By generating their own datasets on incident frequency, nature, and outcome; proposing a parallel system of civilianised emergency care; and mobilising a human rights framework through the judiciary, these activists sought to extract human loss from the narrow confines of the railway's techno-legality, bringing it to the forefront of public consciousness and embedding it within broader debates on citizenship and moral accountability.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Understanding Activists’ Perspectives on Fare-Free Public Transport: What Can We Learn for Transport Justice?]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=182]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Faced with increased urbanisation and aiming to mitigate climate change, many cities strive to develop conditions that support environmentally friendly, efficient, and socially acceptable modes of transport. A key challenge is to strengthen public transport and generate a modal shift away from private cars, while ensuring citizens' access to job opportunities, education, and health services. Accordingly, there is growing research interest in the morally normative perspective on these issues under the label of 'transport justice.' Historically, much work in this field has emphasised a narrow understanding of distributional (in)justice—the allocation of the benefits (resources and opportunities) and burdens of transportation. There is a growing awareness that we need more emphasis on other dimensions of justice (or a broader understanding of distributional justice), such as the need for fair procedures and recognition of affected groups, which are well-established concepts in the literature on environmental and energy justice. In addition, understanding conceptions of justice in civil society through bottom-up and qualitative approaches is central to a comprehensive conceptualisation of transport justice. We investigate activist movements across the Global South and Global North promoting fare-free public transport (FFPT)—an understudied yet key issue for debates on redesigning urban mobility systems. The study reveals that social justice—rather than environmental or economic reasons—is the primary basis for the arguments advanced by FFPT activists and that these groups conceptualise justice in a way that strengthens the trend in transport justice to move beyond a narrow understanding of distributional justice. This, in turn, can augment the academic debate on FFPT and transport justice.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Political Movements: Tim Cresswell’s The Citizen and the Vagabond: A Politics of Mobility]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=181]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article introduces the Dialogue on Tim Cresswell's 2026 book <em>The Citizen and the Vagabond: A Politics of Mobility</em>. The Dialogue includes critical commentaries on the book by a panel of four mobility scholars: Peter Adey, Marian Aguiar, David Bissell, and Weiqiang Lin. The commentaries originally formed part of a panel at the 2025 Global Mobility Humanities Conference in Seoul, South Korea. <em>The Citizen and the Vagabond</em> is the follow-up book to Cresswell's 2006 book <em>On the Move</em>, and it builds upon an approach first outlined in his influential 2010 essay "Towards a Politics of Mobility." In this introduction, I situate the book in relation to Cresswell's writings as a whole.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dialogue on The Citizen and the Vagabond: A Politics of Mobility]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=180]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Peter Adey

Peter Adey is Professor of Human Geography and head of Human Geography, Anthropology and Development Studies (HGADS) at Monash University. He researches the cultures, geopolitics of security, and aesthetic life of mobility and migration, and is the author of 9 books, such as <em>Mobility</em> (2010/2017) and <em>Evacuation: The Politics and Aesthetics of Movement in Emergency</em> (2024); 4 edited books, including <em>the Handbook of Mobilities and the Handbook of Displacement</em>, and 6 special issues, such as <em>Governing Emergencies</em>.

David Bissell

David is a cultural geographer who researches how transformations in mobility, work and housing are reshaping lives. His current projects are exploring how reskilling is taking place in regional Australia, and how private renters rebuild their lives after housing displacement. He is author of <em>Transit Life</em> (MIT Press, 2018), co-editor of <em>Stillness in a Mobile World</em> (Routledge, 2011), <em>Negative Geographies: Exploring the Politics of Limits</em> (Nebraska, 2021), and <em>the Routledge Handbook of Mobilities</em> (2014). He is Managing Editor of <em>Social &amp; Cultural Geography</em> and an Editor of <em>Progress in Human Geography</em>.

Weiqiang Lin

Weiqiang Lin is Associate Professor at the Department of Geography, National University of Singapore. His work lies at the intersection of mobilities, infrastructure, technology and labour. He is section editor of <em>Transfers (Ideas in Motion)</em> and is currently working on a monograph on <em>Atmospheric Labor: On the Affective Making of Aviation Infrastructures</em> with Temple University Press.

Marian Aguiar

Marian Aguiar is an Associate Professor of Literary and Cultural Studies at Carnegie Mellon University, where her work focuses on the intersection of culture and globalization. She is the author of <em>Tracking Modernity: India's Railway and the Culture of Mobility</em> (University of Minnesota, 2012) and <em>Arranging Marriage: Conjugal Agency in the South Asian Diaspora</em> (University of Minnesota, 2018). She is also the co-editor of the 2019 collection <em>Mobilities, Literature, Culture</em> with Lynne Pearce and Charlotte Mathieson. Her forthcoming book, <em>Errant Mobilities: Decolonial Imaginaries of Mediterranean Sea Migration</em> (Manchester UP) explores migration and the imagination of movement in the Mediterranean context.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cultural Representations of Mobility Infrastructures in Utagawa Hiroshige’s Tōkaidō Gojūsan-tsugi]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=179]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article reinterprets Utagawa Hiroshige's <em>Tōkaidō Gojūsan-tsugi</em>(1833-34) as a visual articulation of mobility infrastructures in late Edo-period Japan. While the series has often been approached as a landmark of landscape printmaking, this study argues that it renders visible the cultural production of mobility itself. Drawing on the New Mobilities Paradigm and Henri Lefebvre's theory of the production of space, and later work on movement and spatial formation, the article analyses six selected sites—the Edo starting point of Nihonbashi and the stations of Kambara, Goyu, Numazu, Kusatsu, and Hara—to demonstrate how roads, bridges, and post towns functioned as relational and culturally produced spacces rather than neutral conduits of travel. Through close visual analysis, mobility emerges as a multifaceted process shaped by institutional authority, bodily sensation, social negotiation, economic exchange, ritual and devotional orientation, and environmental forces. The progression from Nihonbashi to Hara traces a conceptual shift from politically structured and socially mediated mobility toward more-than-human entanglements in which climate, terrain, and non-human life actively participate in movement. By reframing Hiroshige's series as a cultural landscape of mobility infrastructures, this article contributes to mobility humanities and visual culture studies, demonstrating how visual art can function as a historical theory of infrastructure, space, and movement.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Entanglements: Banal Mobilities, the Body-Archive, and Transcultural Memory in Atticus Lish’s Preparation for the Next Life]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=178]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 'American dream' narrative of migrant social mobility underpins U.S. national ideology and obscures the political and social histories that drive migration. This article examines how Atticus Lish's <em>Preparation for the Next Life</em> connects cultural memory with mobility to construct a transcultural memory that reveals these masked histories. Drawing on Michael Rothberg's concepts of 'multidirectional' and 'knotted' memory, I argue that the novel's focus on mediated and embodied mobilities performs memory work with aesthetic and narrative function. The mobile body emerges as an archive that articulates and generates mnemonic meanings as it moves and encounters other bodies. The novel's juxtaposition of the undocumented migrant and the traumatised veteran further reveals how personal mobilities and memories intersect with broader historical and political narratives. Overall, this article argues for the importance of examining literary representations of mobility as significant avenues of mnemonic meaning making.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Divergent Tracks: Hungary’s 1968 Railway Dismantling and Czechoslovakia’s Railway Continuity under Central Planning]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=177]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This study examines the evolution of socialist-era transport policy in Hungary, comparing it with developments in Czechoslovakia within the context of centrally planned economies. It focuses on efforts to achieve economic rationality in transport planning at the turn of the 1960s and 1970s, particularly in rail infrastructure. In centrally planned systems, the pursuit of efficiency and optimal resource allocation was the focus of restructuring. From the late 1950s, Hungary closed many underutilised local railway lines to enhance economic performance and prioritise road transport. By contrast, Czechoslovakia largely preserved its railway network intact until the 1990s despite various reform attempts. Hungary's 1968 transport policy represented a particularly bold shift within the Eastern Bloc: the dismantling of approximately 2,000 km of railway lines, which profoundly affected regional accessibility and social mobility and led to peripheralisation in affected areas. The study evaluates the long-term consequences of these measures on sustainability, efficiency, and societal impact. It concludes that many discontinued lines were never adequately replaced, leaving persistent deficits in regional mobility.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Walking as though Narrating: A Review of Shaping Space and Mobilities in Contemporary Walking Narratives]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=176]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Situated at the intersection of literary geography and mobility studies, <em>Shaping Space and Mobilities in Contemporary Walking Narratives</em> examines how literary, poetic, and cinematic texts generate spatial knowledge grounded in movement. The English translation of the original Franco-Italian collection extends its theoretical scope, positioning narrative not as a descriptive tool but as an active mode of spatial production. By framing walking as method and epistemological practice, the essays show how mobility shapes narrative forms and how narrative, in turn, participates in the construction of spatial experience and imaginaries.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobility Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1(Cover, Copyright, and Contents)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=168]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone wp-image-2858" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135437.png" alt="" width="356" height="505" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-2859" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135459.png" alt="" width="354" height="503" /> <img class="alignnone wp-image-2860" src="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/%EC%8A%A4%ED%81%AC%EB%A6%B0%EC%83%B7-2026-01-29-135510.png" alt="" width="355" height="506" />]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspirations of Flight]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=167]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Humankind has long aspired to belong to the heavens, after having roamed the land and the seas as part of their usual existence. Indeed, the possibility of ruling the sky has always captured the imagination of cultures throughout history. In this issue, we aim to examine the varied "aspirations of flight" that populate our world today. At the same time, we hope to inhere a more contested sense of the term, by contemplating three cognate concepts that can help to nuance how aspirations take flight. These are namely grandeur, competition and nostalgia. As an endeavour to challenge gravity and the impossible, flight is a special act already predisposed to promoting itself and sketching positive visions for the future, but it also carries with it its own particular baggage and politics.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Breathing towards Aeromobility: Aspiration, Flying and Elsewhere(s)]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=166]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this essay, I aim to trace connections between aspiration and mobility to argue how aspirations are mobilised through their connection to elsewhere(s). Taking root from Latin <em>ad spirare</em> (to breathe towards), aspirations not only call for an inward drawing of breath, but also a pause before the inevitable expiration. This paper considers both the metaphor and physical act of breathing in the context of mobilities of flight, amongst others. I invoke the metaphor through ethnographic vignettes of both flying and terrestrial mobilities in African and North American contexts, drawing a parallel between the breath which sustains us and the aspirations that drive us, providing a generative lesson for our affective futures. Through these vignettes, I argue that mobilities driven by the presence of elsewhere(s) are key to understanding how aspiration is mobilised.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspirations of Spaceflight and Trials of Infrastructural Capital]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=165]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[Spaceflight calibrates its purview and scope as governments and private companies set out to envelop bodies of planets, moons and asteroids in the techno-industrial processes of production, extraction and destruction. The increasing departures of flights from Earth propel a range of beings and things, ideas and agendas across the Solar System and beyond, heralding the imperial drive of high-tech powers towards bountiful frontiers and magnifying the centrality of infrastructure for aspirations and attempts to grasp them. The enterprise of spaceflight invites us to consider the evolving arena of inquiry into "new geographies of flying" in its space age, bringing into sharp relief the accumulation and investments of "infrastructural capital" that sustain the off-Earth pursuits of power, knowledge and wealth. Attending to the changing aspirations and capacities of spaceflight as it enters a new developmental stage, I outline its key features and itineraries. I explore the striving and struggles involved in movements of infrastructural capital at the space frontier, an evolving off-Earth geography where mobility becomes a vector of power amidst extreme precarity. Such dynamics suggest the central role of spaceflight in upholding aspirations to take the trials of conquest and control outside the globe.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Terminal Politics: Small-state Agency and the Geopolitics of Aviation Infrastructure in Nepal]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=164]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article examines how civil aviation infrastructure operates as both a catalyst for development and a geopolitical instrument, using Nepal's Pokhara International Airport (PIA) as a case study. Rather than generalising from Nepal to a universal model of small-state behaviour, the article uses Nepal as a strategically situated case to analyse how regional asymmetries shape small-state agency. Drawing on fieldwork, interviews, and document analysis, it shows how Nepal used PIA to project sovereignty and diversify diplomatic ties while revealing persistent dependencies. From a Nepali perspective, three dynamics emerge: airports function as sites of geopolitical negotiation rather than merely technical facilities; small states enact agency through symbolic diaplomacy and selective engagement; and infrastructural ambitions remain embedded in asymmetric regional power relations. By foregrounding aviation, an often-overlooked sector in South Asian infrastructure debates, the article develops an analytical framework that bridges Science and Technology Studies, small-state theory, and geopolitics to show how infrastructure projects embody both material and symbolic power.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aspiration and the Aerotropolis: Airports, Infrastructural Speculation and Geoeconomic Form]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=163]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article examines the aerotropolis as a globally circulating geoeconomic model that links aviation infrastructure to supply chains and speculative aspirations of growth. It shows that while aerotropolis imaginaries build upon early ideas of ascendencce associated with flight and fantastical visions of aerial futures, aerotropolis realities often also rehash tired supply chains of logistics, freight and defence that rely on global ecological extractions. While the aerotropolis form is highly contextual, it is at once generic and repetitive. Focusing on three case studies-Dallas Fort Worth, Zhengzhou and Incheon-the article critically analyses how the aerotropolis has been taken up and reworked across distinct geopolitical and institutional contexts. It considers the specific aspirations that have shaped each project, including efforts to establish new urban centres, reconfigure economic regions, and position cites within global logistical networks. In doing so, the article explores the evolving aeropolitics of airport development and considers how the aerotropolis is transformative as both a spatial concept and a vehicle for imagining new geoeconomic forms.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[From Frictionless Futures to Tedious Tasks: Datafication Discourses of the Smart Airport]]></title>
			<link><![CDATA[https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_content_redirect=162]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[This paper examines the sociotechnical imaginaries underpinning the "smart airport," showing how visions of seamless, data-driven dfficiency obscure the laborious human practices that sustain them. Through a discourse analysis of aviation industry marketing materials, contrasted with observations at "SmartAirport," the study reveals how datafication-the conversion of social, material, and environmental processes into machine-readable data-reconfigures labour, power, and mobility within technocapitalist frameworks. While industry narratives frame data as a panacea for operational challenges-depicting it as an omniscient, predictive force promising autonomous, frictionless perations via centralised dashboards and digital twins-this paper exposes the tedium and contingency of datafication in practice. These systems rely on constant human intervention, including calibrating sensors, correcting algorithmic errors, filling data gaps, and maintaining complex infrastructures. By contrasting the aspirational discourse with on-the-ground realities, the paper highlights the paradoxes of datafication: While it promises supra-human efficiency, it intensifies and redistributes labour rather than eliminating it. The study contributes to critical geographies of automation and datafication by emphasising the indispensable role of human work in supposedly autonomous systems and challenging deterministic narratives of technological progress.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[관리자]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 00:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<category domain="https://journal-mobilityhumanities.com/?kboard_redirect=1"><![CDATA[All Issues]]></category>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>